Friday, May 31, 2019
Satan and Jesus in John Miltons Paradise Lost :: Milton Paradise Lost Essays
friction match and Jesus in enlightenment Lost The subject, the drama, and the importance of Paradise Lost is grand. The epic represents what can be accomplished with the English language as sounds and syntax are carefully crafted. But the work is not shallow, because Milton argues forcefully the wisdom and justice of god Almighty for His dealings with mankind. In the words of Samuel Johnson, Milton attempts to show the reasonableness of religion. No doubt, Ezra Pound represents the most vocal of the anti-Milton faction. In his essay, Notes on Elizabethan Classicists, Pound accuses Milton of asinine bigotry, and dislikes the coarseness of his mentality. Pound admires the Byronic hitman-- all and rebellious--who struggles to fight for his lost cause in spite of overwhelming odds. According to Pound, because of his heroic willingness to fight against God and to never give up, fiend is the true hero in Paradise Lost. However, based on his actions, match fails to be any kind of he ro. The real hero of Paradise Lost is the schoolmaster Jesus Christ. Satan is anything but a hero. Satan is a complainer and a whiner. When he realizes that he is in Hell, Satan begins complaining about his injurd merit. For Satan, life is not fair since God the Father loved and preferred His Son more than him. Even though Heaven was lost, Satan states that All is not lost. According to Satan, the unconquerable Will, the study of revenge, and immortal hate remained. However, everything worthwhile is lost. Satan is in Hell because he rebelled against God and God enumerate him with the rebel angels out of Heaven. Here Satan whines because he blames God for not revealing all of His power. Indeed, Satan states that God tempted the angels to rebel in order that the Lord could use His superior strength to crush the rebellion. Also, Satan is a coward. Not willing to confront the angels of Heaven, Satan resorts to disguise and to lying. As a stripling Cherub, Satan asks Uriel, an archan gel, for directions to paradise in order to adore man and to praise God. Uriel does not see Satans hypocrisy, the only evil that walks / Invisible. Once on earth, Satan changes into a wolf, and therefore into a cormorant where he sits in the Tree of Life devising Death / To them who livd. Satan is not contented to be angry with God alone he wants to destroy the innocent and powerless.
Thursday, May 30, 2019
The Automatic Paige Typesetter :: essays research papers
The Automatic Paige TypesetterMany people believed that the Paige typesetter was effect of the nineteenth century. One person who literally put everything he had into it was Samuel Taylor Clemens better known as rat Twain. Mark Twain was the principle m whizzy investor of the automatic Paige typesetter. Twain thought that his investments in the machine would make him richer, and it turned out that the typesetter did the exact opposite. James Paige invented the automatic Paige typesetter around 1877. The typesetter was said to have the big businessman of four mens jobs. It was not only going to be the greatest invention of the nineteenth century, it was going to make publishing companies a fortune by cutting overmatch on time and initial printing costs. In 1877, Dr. George F. Hawley signed a contract with Paige to use his typesetter and the Thompson distributor, another machine that sorted printed papers, to combine them into one machine.The Chicago Herald tested the combined ma chine, or Paige compositor. The machine was roughly eleven feet long, three and one half feet wide, and six feet high. It weighted nearly 5000 pounds, and the power it needed was transmitted through a round belt to a grooved pulley 14 inches in diameter. The machined used about 1/4 to 1/3 horse-power and it could be started and turned up to speed with one finger at a 7-inch leverage. The compositor was particularly made for newspaper printing work. It did all the work of distributing, setting, justifying, and had mechanisms that were adjustable to any width of column desired for newspaper or bookwork.Although the compositor seemed like a good idea it had many a(prenominal) defects and over 18,000 mechanical parts that were not always in working order. James Paige put a great deal of time, effort, and money into his great invention. Mark Twain himself invested and lost 50,000 dollars in the machine. Despite the efforts of everybody involved with the compositor, the Linotype machine hit the market earlier and was more cost effective.
Wednesday, May 29, 2019
Homerââ¬â¢s Iliad - The Shield of Achilles Essay -- Iliad essays
Homers Iliad - The Shield of Achilles Homer devotes the final passages of Book 18 of The Iliad to the interpretation of the shield of Achilles. Only a quarter of the description concerns warfare, the essential grist of the epic. Instead, the bulk of the description presents a peaceful society and rural idylls, a curious choice for the most ferocious warrior of the Greeks, and an odd thing for some(prenominal) armies to fear. A narrative emerges from the scenes of the shield, and it is this that fits Achilles and repulses everyone else. We expect Achilles shield to unsettle his adversariesthat is, after all, one of the objectives of a shield. Indeed, Achilles returns to battle shining in all his armour, a valet equivalent the murderous war god (Iliad 20.46).1 Once he and Hektor are alone on the battlefield, the shield shines like that star which comes on in the autumn and whose outstanding br ightness far outshines the stars that are numbered in the nights darkening, the star they give the name of Orions Dog, which is brightest among the stars, and yet is wrought as a sign of evil and brings on the great fever for unfortunate mortals. (22.26-31) We need not wonder, then, when Priam and Hecuba supplicate Hektor to return to Troy in the face of this practically cosmic onslaught. But what is unusual is that Achilles own men avoid the shield None had the courage / to look straight at it. They were afraid of it (19.14-15). Here even the history relies on the pronoun it instead of explicitly identifying the shield as the source of... ...ictory. If Achilles had chosen to leave, not only would he have been a good son, but the Trojans tycoon have won the war, meaning both he and Priam would have had something to which they could look forward, and three-fourths of the shields story would n ot have been left unfulfilled. In staying, he contributes not only to his own demise, but also to that of the Trojans. This knowledge causes the anger to come harder upon him (19.16), and yet he was glad (19.18). The great dilemma of Achilles is forever immortalized on his shield, so that some lesser man in the future would be able to read the narrative upon it and say This armor was Achilles, a man who forfeited the rest of his life for grim combat. The gods do not force most men to choose like that. NOTES 1. Homer, The Iliad, trans. Richmond Lattimore (Chicago University of Chicago Press, 1951).
Mozarts Life ( Brief Summary) :: essays research papers
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart is often referred to as the greatest musical genius of all time in Western musical tradition. His fictive method was extraordinary his writings show that he almost always wrote a complete composition mentally before finally writing it on paper. Mozart created 600 works in his short life of 35 years. His works included 16 operas, 41 symphonies, 27 piano concerti, and 5 violin concerti, 25 run quartets, and 19 masses.Mozart was born on Jan. 27, 1756, in Salzburg, Austria. His father was Leopold Mozart, a composer and a popular violinist. Mozart received his early musical training from his father. At the early advance of 3 Mozart showed signs of being a musical genius. Then, at the age of five Mozart started composing. Beginning in 1762 Mozarts father took young Mozart and his older sister, Maria Anna, on tours in Europe where they played the piano, harpsichord, violin, and organ, together and separately. Mozart learned to play the piano, harpsichord, and vio lin from his father. He gave public concerts and played at numerous courts and received several commissions. As an adult Mozart his career was not as successful as when he was younger. But he kept on composing anyway hoping one plurality would appreciate his work. He lived in poverty for the great majority of his life. In 1769 he became a concertmaster to the archbishop of Salzburg, which was another one of his jobs that afforded him little financial security. In 1777, he left on another concert tour. But, the courts of Europe ignored Mozart s search for a more beneficial assignment. In 1782 he earned a living by selling compositions, giving public performances, and giving music lessons, which once again was a low paying job. The composer never did find a well paying job. The bizarre thing was is that even that he had ton of trouble finding jobs, he was st mad considered one of the leading composers of the late 1700s. Mozart became ill suffering from headaches and fever for several months. Mozart was under the illusion that he was to write music for his funeral.
Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Armchair Economist book report Essay -- Steven Landsburg
Economic theories are as wide as an economists vision to think. In the Steven Landsburg book The Armchair Economist - Economics and Everyday Life, Landsburg takes many a(prenominal) another(prenominal) of these economic theories and relates them to general type scenarios and makes them understandable to a beginning economist. He breaks his book into six sections for each one relating to different types of economics, from personal to national theories. Landsburg talks about the power of incentives in his first chapter. What he is referring to is how incentives drive peoples decisions to do things in life. He makes an analogy that Seatbelts kill. This disceptation refers to the added protection one gets from wearing a seatbelt, which will entice someone to take greater risks while driving a vehicle. We as consumers are bombarded with incentives everyday in the market place. Incentives, come in all forms, sale prices, free-bees, coupons. Incentives are designed to make you do something NOW instead of putting it of until later. Incentives are non eternally a good thing, such as in today?s housing market. Homebuyers were offered sub-prime and zero percent interest rates to purchase homes. This impart buyers to buy a bit more home than maybe they were qualified to get. Buyers made these decisions at the time because they looked safe, but in the long run many of these buyers pose had to give up these homes due to bank foreclosure. Landsburg also talks about maximizing our efficiencies. He relates this theory into an idea of why Rolling Stones concerts always sell out. Is it because they play good music? Maybe. Most likely it is because its tickets are priced right. Pricing tickets is a theory of Supply and Dem... ... that can be manipulated or misleading. Since this is the beat of all things in the market place there are time where something will not qualify for that. For example, If my moms water heater went out, she could pay the money to have a plumber come and remove and install a new one. The money spent on that would increase GNP. On the other hand if she had her married man do the work the money not being spent on the installation is not going into GNP. This is called household production, which GNP omits. There are many ideas and topics in Landsburgs? book that were covered throughout the semester. As you can see in just the few topics that I chose to go into economics hits everyone everyday. If we are making decisions on what to eat what to wear or how to spend our hard earned money, it all affects economics and economic effects us.
Armchair Economist book report Essay -- Steven Landsburg
Economic theories are as wide as an economists vision to think. In the Steven Landsburg book The Armchair Economist - Economics and Everyday Life, Landsburg takes many another(prenominal) an(prenominal) of these economic theories and relates them to prevalent type scenarios and makes them understandable to a beginning economist. He breaks his book into six sections all(prenominal) relating to different types of economics, from personal to national theories. Landsburg talks about the power of incentives in his first chapter. What he is referring to is how incentives drive peoples decisions to do things in life. He makes an analogy that Seatbelts kill. This parameter refers to the added protection one gets from wearing a seatbelt, which will entice someone to take greater risks while driving a vehicle. We as consumers are bombarded with incentives everyday in the market place. Incentives, come in all forms, sale prices, free-bees, coupons. Incentives are designed to m ake you do something NOW instead of putting it of until later. Incentives are non ceaselessly a good thing, such as in today?s housing market. Homebuyers were offered sub-prime and zero percent interest rates to purchase homes. This stomach buyers to buy a bit more home than maybe they were qualified to get. Buyers made these decisions at the time because they looked safe, but in the long run many of these buyers throw away had to give up these homes due to bank foreclosure. Landsburg also talks about maximizing our efficiencies. He relates this theory into an idea of why Rolling Stones concerts always sell out. Is it because they play good music? Maybe. Most likely it is because its tickets are priced right. Pricing tickets is a theory of Supply and Dem... ... that can be manipulated or misleading. Since this is the whole tone of all things in the market place there are time where something will not qualify for that. For example, If my moms water heater went o ut, she could pay the money to have a plumber come and remove and install a new one. The money spent on that would increase GNP. On the other hand if she had her save do the work the money not being spent on the installation is not going into GNP. This is called household production, which GNP omits. There are many ideas and topics in Landsburgs? book that were covered throughout the semester. As you can see in just the few topics that I chose to go into economics hits everyone everyday. If we are make decisions on what to eat what to wear or how to spend our hard earned money, it all affects economics and economic effects us.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)